- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <andrew_kirkpatrick@wgbh.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:43:35 -0500
- To: Kelly Pierce <kpierce2000@earthlink.net>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Kelly, On 3/24/04 11:00 PM, "Kelly Pierce" <kpierce2000@earthlink.net> wrote: > I wrote to AOL using its e-mail address listed on its accessibility web page > (AOLAccessibility@aol.com) > and received the bounced message below. Apparently, AOL access is not > functioning either as an e-mail address or as a company concept. > > Its new media player does not have a means to control volume that is > accessible to the blind. it is controlled using a slide bar and mouse only. I do know that the aolaccessibility@aol.com address is still functioning. I don't know why your message bounced, but I know from my contact at AOL that they are aware of the issue that you raise and I'm cc'ing them on this message so they can contact you directly. Keyboard and screen reader control of embedded media players is uniformly poor, and this version of the aol media player is no exception. The Quicktime player, when embedded will allow some control of the media player controls (volume, next/previous song, etc.), but no embedded player gives the same level of control as the standalone version of the same player. I know AOL will be interested in hearing your observations and wishes, but you might also want to raise the issue with the radio station that is using the player and ask that they provide a link to open the stream in a standalone player. I agree that this is an issue that should be addressed, and the fact that other embedded players doesn't provide justification for the inaccessibility of the media player, but I don't think that a blanket dismissal of AOL's accessibility efforts is appropriate. Andrew -- Andrew Kirkpatrick Project Manager, WGBH National Center for Accessible Media 125 Western Ave. Boston, MA 02134 617-300-4420 (direct voice/FAX) 617-300-3400 (main NCAM) 617-300-2489 (TTY)
Received on Friday, 26 March 2004 12:44:46 UTC