- From: Jim Tobias <tobias@inclusive.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:36:59 -0500
- To: "'James Craig'" <wai-ig@cookiecrook.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I have 2 conflicting philosophical responses to your excellent, provocative article: 1. Of course it's the user's responsibilitiy, once the designer has discharged his/her accessibility duties. That's why the phrase "until user agents can..." is used. How can it be right to hold a designer hostage to certain technologies merely preferred by some users, if suitable alternatives exist? Looking at the issue economically, there is a set of costs for backward compatibility. If a "backward" user agent still exists, but is used by only a handful of people who all could use something else, the accessibility cost per user becomes too high to justify. (This is especially true if we assume that only so much money will be spent on accessibility overall. Then every euro spent on "unnecessary" backward compatibility prevents other accessibility improvements that may serve the same people better, or serve many more people.) 2. Of course it's not the user's responsibility! Many of the accessibility settings in today's user agents are not defaults. What percentage of consumers understand how to configure their browsers? I would guess less than 5% of consumers with disabilities have the necessary information and confidence. Is that their fault? If not, why should they be punished? I'm not sure you will gain anything useful for your update, but I think such points are important to consider. Let me thank you again for allowing us to raise our eyes from the everyday technical tasks to a larger arena. ***** Jim Tobias Inclusive Technologies tobias@inclusive.com 732.441.0831 v/tty www.inclusive.com > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of James Craig > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:17 PM > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: User Responsibility for Web Accessibility > > > > I am about to post a follow-up to a topic brought up in our > SXSW panel, > but I wanted to get some more feedback, first. Any thoughts? > > User Responsibility for Web Accessibility: > <http://cookiecrook.com/sxsw/2004/demo/> > > Thanks in advance, > James Craig > > -- > http://cookiecrook.com/ >
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 15:37:00 UTC