- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:29:04 +0000
- To: wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> > Using the accept language header removes the need to > > actively select the language from the great majority of > > users at the cost of slightly reducing the ease of > > selecting a different language for the minority. > > There is a legacy problem. I have run into sites that > assume "English" is there from the browser default, so > the presense of any other language (even not in the first > position) forces me into that language. This might even > be a sensible guess, though it wasn't correct for me. > > In a few cases, I even got 404s, because they didn't support > "my" language yet, though they did support English. That isn't a legacy problem; it was never correct behaviour. That said, it is reasonable to return a language other than the first one listed in some cases, if a user prefers English, but will also accept French (Accept-Language: en, fr) and the server has a French original and an English translation that the people behind the server don't think is a very good translation, then it may be appropriate to serve the French version (the quality numbers in the Accept-Language headers are intended to help with this, unfortunately most browsers don't allow the user to get at them). -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 12:29:06 UTC