- From: David Dorward <david@us-lot.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:41:33 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 16:20, Apple Tv wrote: This message was posted as a response to one of mine, but due to lack of quoting its difficult to tell if it was actually intended as such. > Regarding the User Agents What about user agents? My only mention of a specific user agent was lynx, and that was to illustrate the point that the site it was proposed we follow the example of wasn't, perhaps, a very good example. > I don't believe that we > should section off communities by pigeon holing groups > of English/German/French users together, purely > because of a specific User Agent. I don't believe anyone here has suggested that we do so, and I agree that to do so would be a bad idea. The Accept-Language header (which has been part of http for rather a long time) is supported by many user agents (including Internet Explorer) > This could only be done efficiently when all browsers > have a visible and accessible option for isers to > change their browsing language on the Agent. I would > imaging this to be done using different requests for > Uni-code. As has been pointed out elsewhere in this thread, this header is generally set to a reasonable default value. Of course the site should provide means to override that preference. -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2004 11:43:29 UTC