- From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:44:24 -0500
- To: "P.H.Lauke" <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> I'd almost go as far as saying that, perhaps, the pure XML feed should > not be directly "clickable" for a human user at all...but that > would require > a standard auto-discovery mechanism for RSS readers (then again, there may > already be something along those lines...I have to admit this is an area I > only lightly dabbled in). <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS" href="http://www.wats.ca/wats.xml" /> See also our article: http://www.wats.ca/articles/missinglink/49 > > An interesting approach I saw a while back was the use of > (client-side) XSL > to present RSS feeds in a nicer way...but again, this does not solve the > issue of browsers that don't know what to do with the XML in the > first place... > > http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2003/11/05/plugging_the/ We have also linked a style sheet to our feed: http://www.wats.ca/wats.xml. Note, while this provides a formatted presentation, none of the "permalinks" or active hyperlinks are "clickable" or active, as the <a> anchor element is not present in the original feed. One other method is to provide a partially formatted, but un-styled feed using a server side (PHP) script: http://www.zaphodbeeblebrox.com/RSS/zaphod.php (Note: this is a "code snip" intended for server-side includes) JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca 1.866.932.4878 (North America)
Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 09:44:29 UTC