- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:59:44 +0000
- To: "tina@greytower.net" <tina@greytower.net>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Quoting Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>: > > > IMHO a <dl> is more appropriate. I used one at > > <http://www.hackcraft.net/cv/>, > > > > Now this confuses me. Are you saying that in the above "Jeroen" is a > > description of the term "Firstname" ? > > The use of definition lists for general name/value pairs is a bit of a > stretch > of the semantics, but a common one (em, I thought, maybe I'm completely > wrong > on this). I've seen it similarly used for heirarchical data and it's only > just > occurring to me that perhaps this is HTML abuse. From <http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html>: "Another application of DL, for example, is for marking up dialogues, with each DT naming a speaker, and each DD containing his or her words." That clearly isn't a matter of terms and descriptions, so I think it justifies the use of <dl> for general name/value pairs. I'm now happy again that this isn't HTML abuse, and indeed is quite appropriate. -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 09:59:45 UTC