- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:13:31 -0500 (EST)
- To: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> <a href="[16]http://www.somedest.com" title="opens a new browser window">link > text"</a> > > The problem with this is that title already has a pretty well defined > meaning for this element; The full definition is as follows: <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/global.html#adef-title> <quoth> This attribute offers advisory information about the element for which it is set. Unlike the [96]TITLE element, which provides information about an entire document and may only appear once, the [97]title attribute may annotate any number of elements. </quoth> The title attribute is *unlike* the <title> element. You the author may make your title attribute equal to the <title> element of some other document, for whatever strange reason you may have, but it is in no way required. It doesn't even make sense. I know that in the last two weeks, WCAG has suddenly decided that the title attribute exists and must contain part of the <title> element, but this is nonsense. There isn't a single standards-compliant Web developer who uses title attributes who uses them only that way. It's a terrible idea. > it should be the same as the title element > content on target resource. For an external link like this, it should > either match the title element, or be what the title element would have > been if the author had been competent, or the media type had supported > one. Oh, I *see*. > Your usage is based on the misinterpretation that title = tool tip. A title functionally *is* a tooltip for most users, including a large number of people with disabilities. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Author, _Building Accessible Websites_ <http://joeclark.org/access/> | <http://joeclark.org/book/>
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 18:09:35 UTC