- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:10:11 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Dave P, Yes, I use at that speaks my messages to me and Yes, I can mittigate the impact of > > > to some degree but if I do than I won't hear it when I need to. ----- Original Message ----- From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 8:10 AM Subject: RE: [WAI-IG] Top posting. An attempted summary Just picking up one point from David P. I hate >>>>>>>>>>>> or: > > > > > > > even more since in the first instance, I will hear three at most and in the latter I will hear each one because they are spaced. daveP. I think I recall you use Access technology? So conclusion is that an alternative method of grabbing the who said what is a desirable improvement? Or does it matter? Is it enough to comprehend that someone on this thread said this piece? What about the semantics of this piece is 3 replies ago, this other one two replies ago. Is that useful information? regards DaveP. ** snip here ** - DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Monday, 1 March 2004 09:10:14 UTC