- From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 08:48:30 -0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I've changed the subject, since it appears that top posting impacts sighted users as well. My view of a summary. 1. top posting can greatly increase volume, and some users still pay for bandwidth. 2. Replying in context. If an email has multiple topics which you want to answer individually, then top posting may make it harder. This is obviously far more of a problem in long emails than in brief ones. 3. Inferred semantics. Determining who said what. Interleaved comments to me give some intimation that the text with 5 right angle brackets is getting pretty old by now, the text with no indentation is recent. Handled variably by various email clients. I've seen one who has the initials of the poster instead of the angle brackets. 4. Line wrap. Unsure if this is just visual or not, but I wholly agree its a pain to untangle the line wrap when replies are preceeded by the angle brackets. Does it mess up interpretation for screen reader users too? 5. Navigation. If navigation is not easy for whatever reason, top posting in other than simple messages isn't easy. 6. Tool restrictions. If your email tool is line based, top posting is easy for you, interleaving isn't. 7. It could be that long complex emails need treating differently than brief answers, but surely there must be some benefit in a consistant approach. 8. Be considerate of time lag. If your reader isn't going to read your post near the time of others, then top posting is harder to comprehend without the context of interleaved posts. 9. I liked Charles keep the language clear. Possibly as important as most of the other points. What did I miss? regards DaveP ** snip here ** - DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Monday, 1 March 2004 03:48:39 UTC