- From: Visisoul - Isabelle <olists@visisoul.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:36:29 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Scarlett Julian (ED) (snip) > I may be taking the wrong approach but I always favour the <ul> > approach with each <li> being a link to the page. > > See http://www.sheffield.gov.uk/education/schools-area/site-map > as an example. > > Maybe this approach is why I see no functional difference between > a site map and a table of contents. I don't think you are taking a wrong approach at all! I have used this before myself (in a site that's not in my portfolio). :) I'm really trying to be a bit *creative* in approach with this site and yet I still want the site map to be universally accessible. It's a smaller site; therefore, I was less concerned about the potential confusion. So, for example, if a Lynx browser is used I want it to still make sense. My objective here was to create a visual representation without too many graphics while using text links. Mind you, I was having trouble with the FYI and top level links. *grin* I just *have* to be different, don't I? <--- trouble maker. P.S. My apologies if this gets duplicated, I'm fixing my outgoing and incoming email addresses for this list! Isabelle <http://www.is.visisoul.com> Dreamhost Web hosting - it's truly a dream especially for Web Designers and Developers!! <http://www.dreamhost.com/rewards.cgi?bdip> Referral ID: bdip
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2004 04:36:28 UTC