- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 07:43:37 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> incorrectly. I agree that it might not be necessarily good to have all > graphics turned on, but labeled graphics is certainly within the realm of > expectation for a user of a graphical environment. Surely the problem here is the level of abuse of alt attributes. If you ignore the sites that don't use them at all, you will find a large number of sites that treat them as a Netscape 4 tooltip feature, and a lot that apply token accessibility compliance by providing alt text that matches the image file name, or which is a description rather than an alternative. You will also still find sites (I hit one recently) that use them for keyword stuffing (for search engine manipulation).
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2004 02:51:02 UTC