- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:38:12 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> [Jon Hanna] > BTW. There is no need to use the <a> element when you are using > id, you can put > the id onto any element in the content. > > [Ricardo] > Bobby doesn't report errors with "id" in elements, but we have > the same problem with backwards compatibility. See: > http://www.timon.com/bobby5.html If maintaining backwards compatibility I'd personally prefer to use id on an element surrounding the section in question, even if name was still used. <p id="intro"> <a name="intro"></a>introductory paragraph. </p> To my mind this ties in the use of id as a target with other uses of id (e.g. CSS or using the URI including the fragment the subject of an RDF statement). -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> *Thought provoking quote goes here*
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2004 05:42:27 UTC