- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:03:09 +0100 (CET)
- To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On 21 Jan, Jim Ley wrote:
> "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>
>> >Except of course you've got a very peculiar definition of "DHTML
> menus"...
>>
>> So I ran this by an expert.
>
> Which is a rather offensive way of putting it...
Agreed. However, I fully expect to be flamed for feeling offended.
>> Longtime readers will be aware that I
>> tend to do that. (And tend to know the experts.) Steven Champeon,
>> coauthor of _Building Dynamic HTML GUIs_ <http://dhtml-guis.com/>,
>> take it away!
>
> Authoring a book does not make someone more of an expert, than someone who
> hasn't authored a book.
I wish it was so. People seem to have mostly forgotten Alistair
MacLeans definition of expert:
"An expert can be loosely defined as a person who vaguely
knows what he is talking about"
- "Santorini"
I have spent far too many hours being yelled at for disagreeing with
Zeldman, and being told I should listen to my betters to even attempt
to shake the fatigue that Mr. Clark's words bring.
However:
The definition of DHTML that I know, and that oddly enough seem to
tally with my colleagues in "the field" so to speak, goes something
like this:
"The use of client-side scripting to, by way of a document object
model, modify HTML and CSS"
The object model in question may be an IE-specific one; a
Netscape-specific one, or the WAI DOM. The scripting language can be
Javascript, Jscript, ECMAscript, or - for that matter - Scheme.
However, to quote a colleague:
"I wouldn't agree with _any_ definition of DHTML. It's a vague and
much abused marketing buzzword better replaced by more verboose
terminology."
I'd suggest not talking about "DHTML" at all; in particular not in
documents of a technical and precise nature.
(This must be the third time in twelve months we - atleast
partially - agree on something, Jim. Scary trend ;)
--
- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies
tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/
[+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2004 09:11:56 UTC