- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:32:55 -0000
- To: "WAI-IG" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
"Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org> > >> 4. Graceful transformations into lists etc. where the > >> browser does not or is set not to support scripts and/or css. > > > >Richard's menus do this. The DHTML menus don't have a chance. What a ridiculous assertion, there are lots of DHTML menus that degrade to lists. > >So in summary, counting the various 'almosts' as halves, that's a > >score of 5.5/7 (disregarding point 8) for Richard's, and 1.5 or 2/7 > >for the DHTML menus. Clearly we're on the right path. Except of course you've got a very peculiar definition of "DHTML menus"... Jim.
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2004 13:34:03 UTC