- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:18:39 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
In the UK there is a product being marketted to the low end of the internet market (e.g. those too old to have been part of the computer generation - i.e. older than about 40 - wanting it to communicate with younger members of the family who are part of it) which claims to have 300,000 units installed and over 1 million users. If you allow for estimates of the number of people with no web access, this could amount to as much as 5% of web users in the UK. The product (which is sold as a loss leader and funded by premium rate calls to a dedicated ISP[1] and by push advertising which is displayed whilst the terminal is otherwise idle) uses Mobile Internet Explorer (which is no longer documented on Microsoft's site). They explicitly say it is designed for low graphics sites and that is doesn't support scripting or CSS. It has a fairly low resolution, greyscale only, screen (40 character wide equivalent, although graphic). It is primarily sold as a combination phone, answering machine and email terminal for non-technical users. The significance here is that a company and most major electronics retailers (I assume they get trail commission, or the whole of the sale price) in the UK believes there is a real market for a non-mobile browser that is incapable of supporting high tech. web sites. The business model probably considers the market to be an untapped affluent one, but it will also catch less affluent users. I wouldn't consider it for my elderly parents because one either restricts oneself to the cooperating web sites, or needs a lot of web savvy to find usable ones. [1] email is offline and the rate used has a (farily low) premium connect charge but normal time charges, so it should be possible to operate at a relatively low cost.
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2004 02:41:46 UTC