- From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:54:09 -0500
- To: "Isabelle" <isabelle@visisoul.com>
- Cc: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello Isabelle, Ah, Accesskeys... We have done quite some research on this topic and have posted a number of articles about them at our website www.wats.ca In a nutshell, after taking a long hard look at Accesskeys, we have determined that they really don't provide a whole bunch of true accessibility, and the use of Accesskeys is fraught with implementation and "universality" issues, the least of which being that across multiple user agents and adaptive technology solutions the majority of available keystroke combinations is reduced to virtually no real choices. Even the emerging UK quasi-standard (which uses numeric values) has conflicts with at least one screen reading technology as well as being "non-functional" in a number of older and current browsers: Opera for one (which started supporting Accesskeys in Version 7) does not support the use of numeric values... (oops!) The specific articles on our site are: http://www.wats.ca/resources/accesskeys/19 - Using Accesskeys - Is it worth it? http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeyconflicts/37 - More reasons why we don't use accesskeys http://www.wats.ca/resources/accesskeysandkeystrokes/38 - Accesskeys and Reserved Keystroke Combinations http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeyalternatives/52 - Link Relationships as an Alternative to Accesskeys See also: http://www.wats.ca/resources/jawskeystrokes/9 - Working with JAWS: Keystroke Quick Reference Chart Hope this helps... JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca 1.866.932.4878 (North America) > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Isabelle > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:57 PM > To: WAI Interest Group > Subject: Accesskeys and other link levels > > > > OK. So, I'm adding accessibility to my site(s) and I have added the > accesskeys to top level links but what about 2nd and 3rd level links? If > the person is mobility impaired, wouldn't they want access keys for > *everything* or maybe I'm just not *getting it* and someone can > clarify this > for me. :) > > Cheers, > > Isabelle > http://www.is.visisoul.com (not up to my own accessible > standards... yet)... > :) > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:54:21 UTC