- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:53:38 -0500
- To: sdale@stevendale.com, g.gay@utoronto.ca
- Cc: info@atutor.ca, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
There is a tool to conver Microsoft Office documents to accessible valid HTML. http://cita.rehab.uiuc.edu/software/office Jon ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:44:48 -0400 (EDT) >From: "Steven Dale" <sdale@stevendale.com> >Subject: Re: ACollab Work Groups 1.1 Content accessible? >To: <g.gay@utoronto.ca> >Cc: <info@atutor.ca>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > > >> Perhaps someday AChecker could evaluate uploaded content, but that's a >> ways off. AChecker is a web content accessibility verifier. It evaluates >> HTML. Though you could use HTML files with ACollab, users would >> probably be more likely to be sharing MSword docs, text files, or some >> other non-web format. >Yes, That is what I am having problems trying to solve. When someone >uploads an article, for instance in word format, how do you make sure it >is converted to accessible html on the fly? If web desingers didnt have >to adapt the uploaded files for accessibility, their acceptance of an >accessible web would be more open. > >> >> Forcing authors to make their content accessible, though perhaps >> desirable, is not practical from a business perspective. If they don't >> like being forced, they will use someone else product that does not >> force accessibility upon them. >> There has to be legislation to enforce >> this type of requirement. You're better off making the accessibility >> tools available, and informing your users, than forcing them to abide >> (in most cases). >> > >I think they should be forced, and the legislation, though not quite there >at the moment, is certainly headed there. I think having a tool to >convert the different files into something accessible would be a good >start. I believe having the authoring tools force accessibility while >creating the documents would eliminate these problems. As to companies >using other products, if the accessibility were forced with little extra >effort on the user, I would think they would use the product. I believe >the choice of a product would be for other reasons where accessibility >forcefullness being at the bottom. > >-Steve > > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://cita.rehab.uiuc.edu/ WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 20:54:18 UTC