- From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:47:14 +0100
- To: accessys@smart.net
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
-----Original Message----- From: Access Systems how do you define "Special needs" (I HATE THAT TERM) I didn't define it, I found it in the SVG diagram. > Device independence in general may aid accessibility, does it help > define it? part of the code. the accessibility must be cross platform and software independent In which case I'd say that was a part of the scope of the definitions. Which *code* are you referring to btw? this has probably caused the most grief, the NFB in the USA has been the driving force (at least vocally) on accessibility (in computer software), since they represent visually impaired users they tend to only really be concerned with their members and others get lost in the din. I'd support that view as being common, I'm probably as guilty as most of taking that view unless I'm reminded of it. I think segmenting the groups would just pit one against the other and software/programmers might just cherry pick those it is convienent for them to accomodate and ignore the rest, and have an "out" At least it might be a positive decision? My guess is that today thats a position taken due in large part through lack of understanding? sometimes defining the questions leads to better answers Agreed, I define the first level of understanding as knowing enough to ask questions. regards DaveP -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 09:48:58 UTC