- From: Steven Dale <sdale@stevendale.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:24:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Oh, yes if you want to have different semantic levels inside a cell, I certainly would mark them up in the same way you would mark up stuff outside a data table. Headings need not be the only thing... Lists could be used in a single cell as well. Etc. Sailesh Panchang said: > Take a look at the data table at > http://www.eramp.com/david/traffic_cop_prototype_staticc_no_rows.htm The > cells in the first column are marked up as th and use h2 within. Well > this table uses rowspan. But the one I described in my mail does not and > just marking up elementary/mid/high school cells in first column > with say h2 and not the grades under them will be useful to a screen > reader user. Even while associating data cells to header cells, just > th mark-up is enough and one need not use headers-id for data cells in > the grade-rows. >>Why not just style the <TH> the same as your <H>? > Styling alone will not convey the structural relation. > Sailesh Panchang said: >> Hello all, >> HTML accessibility guidelines or specs say nothing about use of >> heading taggs (h1, h2, etc) for marking up group / section headings >> within data tables. Consider, for instance first column groups grades >> 1 to 12 under elementary/mid and high schools and other columns have >> values against the grades. Running down the first column with screen >> reading software >> will speak out the heading markup and inform the user that the items >> below belong to that group. They could be marked uup with h2 or h3 and >> styled to maintain visual l&f. A simple technique but I do not see it >> being mentioned for making certain data tables accessible. Comments? >> Sailesh Panchang >> Senior Accessibility Engineer >> Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, >> 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 >> Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 >> E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com >> Fax: 703-225-0387 >> * Look up <http://www.deque.com> *
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 18:25:08 UTC