- From: yoan SIMONIAN <yoan.simonian@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 10:32:14 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Just a question : If that links have to be hidden, why not put it on an invisible pixel like that : <a href="#content"><img src="nul.gif" alt="skip to content" width="1" height="1"></a> Do you think it's a good way ? All Screenreaders will see it, lynx too. In France we suggest this way to hidde links to developpers. -- yoan SIMONIAN Responsable Technologies Association BrailleNet Le Mercredi 19 Mai 2004 11:23, P.H.Lauke a écrit : > > I personally can't see what's wrong with having it visible at > > all times to all users. > > Unfortunately (?) a lot of designers will want the skip link to be > both present and unobtrosive (as the whole display:none > versus visibility:hidden debacle seems to indicate). An addition, > I would also implement at least two stylesheets: one with the "hidden > until tabbed to" skip link styles, and one with the skip link visible > all the time. > > I'm not saying that this is the best solution, or the only one... > just trying to throw some ideas around. > > Patrick > ________________________________ > Patrick H. Lauke > Webmaster / University of Salford > http://www.salford.ac.uk -- Yoan SIMONIAN Responsable Technologies Association BrailleNet
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2004 04:32:42 UTC