- From: david poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:31:25 -0400
- To: "P.H.Lauke" <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
yes, but then we get into the circle of how to present this possibility to a user and if we are in some settings, this might not be achievable. We need to make the visibility favorability stronger in future work. ----- Original Message ----- From: "P.H.Lauke" <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk> To: "david poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:20 AM Subject: RE: "Blind for a Day" - visibility: hidden vs none > A person who uses the mouse and enlarges the screen might > want to click this > link but not using the tab key and not having the link > visible till it is > tabbed to and using scroll bars rather than mouseing over > links till perhaps > they see one that would be usefull would never encounter a > link that was > only visible if tabbed to or moused over. Interestingly enough, as soon as I sent you my last email, I sort of came up with a similar possible scenario myself. Thanks for the clear explanation. In that case I would suggest (IMHO, of course) that this particular user may be best served by selecting the "accessible" (as much as I hate the word) stylesheet which makes everything visible (and, in addition, could expand acronyms/abbreviations and write out all accesskey definitions via CSS :before and :after). Sure, in an ideal world the default style of a site should already do this, but this more often than not clashes with aesthetic sensibilities of designers and/or clients... Patrick________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2004 09:32:25 UTC