- From: Steven Dale <sdale@stevendale.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 20:42:44 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <jim@jimthatcher.com>
- Cc: <joeclark@joeclark.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Jim, This guy seemed to actually use the screen reader instead of trying to test something with it. Indeed that is very unusual. He suddenly was keenly aware of the problems and not trying to just get his website by with the minimum amount of work needed. True, he may be right on from a blind user's recommendations. He still misses the mark for most mobility impaired users who would like the use of skip navigation that he so elequently stated as useful but hidden. Hmmmm not getting my point? What was his complaint about hidden in CSS... If you can't see the skip navigation while using a switch as input you cannot use it and therefore are stuck yet again. Accessibility, though very beneficial to blind users, should be available to ALL users. -Steve Jim Thatcher said: > > Joe, > > It has nothing to do with verbosity settings. His recommendations are > absolutely right on; every one. He did mention putting main content near > the top because "the thing I hated the most was having to blast past > five hundred links in a sidebar in order to get to the actual content." > I am impressed with how well this guy understood the problems of > listening to web content. Very unusual. > > Jim > Accessibility, What Not to do: http://jimthatcher.com/whatnot.htm. Web > Accessibility Tutorial: http://jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Joe Clark > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 1:36 PM > To: WAI-IG > Subject: "Blind for a Day" > > > Bloggeur tries out IBM Home Page Reader and shares tips. He should > learn about verbosity settings, though. > > <http://www.mojombo.com/archives/000034.html> > -- > > Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org | <http://joeclark.org/access/> > Author, _Building Accessible Websites_ | > <http://joeclark.org/book/> Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 20:43:15 UTC