- From: Matthew Smith <matt@kbc.net.au>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:50:19 +0930
- To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Greetings All I have three questions regarding the <h1> element that I would like to put to you: 1) Use of the same <h1> content throughout a collection of pages. If a Web site or collection of pages covers one topic, even if by this a topic can be something like "Fred's Family Web Site", would it be reasonable to say that all pages should have the same <h1> content, with an <h2> to denote specific page content? I ask this because I don't see a true way of saying, within (X)HTML, "this page is part of a collection". We can do this, or course, by inserting metadata into the page, but this is not actually (X)HTML as such. <link rel="prev"/> and other <head> elements may convey a navigation structure but still, as far as I can see, fail to identify the actual collection of pages in which we are working. I feel that, from an accessibility point of view, especially if we are trying to use software to make sense of a document, that this would be preferable to having partially variable headers such as <h1>Fred's Family Web Site : Our Holiday</h1>. (I would, however, consider such a scheme appropriate for content of the <title> element in the (X)HTML <head> element.) 2) Use of images (logos) as <h1> content. A quick check on the XHTML 1.0 strict DTD shows that I can use an <img /> element inside <h1>. If a logo contains wording, for example: a company name, provided that the alt attribute matches the wording in the picture, is it acceptable to have only that image as my <h1> header? It looks fine on Lynx, but I am uncertain as to how a screen reader would interpret this. 3) I have seen extensive use of a logo as link content to a "home" page - far more than use of <link rel=""/>. Whilst I still believe in using <link rel=""/>, is it good practice to have an image as a header which is also a link to the "home" page of a collection? Thanks in anticipation... Cheers M -- Matthew Smith Kadina Business Consultancy South Australia
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:20:39 UTC