- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:46:20 +0100 (BST)
- To: David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk wrote: > > Does that work the same as Valet by using separate parsers > for SGML/HTML and XML/XHTML, or have you developed/found a > parser that validates both? > > sp does both Nick. Just needs the xml declaration prior to the instance, > then it uses XML syntax. Yes. But, SP's XML support has a number of known limitations. There's some very brief documentation of them on the SP webpages. > (Caution, I'm speaking about sp, rather than the opensp, but its probably > safe to assume that, unless someone knows differently?) SP is unmaintained. OpenSP is merely SP updated and enhanced. > SET SP_CHARSET_FIXED=YES > SET SP_ENCODING=XML > > > NSGMLS.EXE -wxml -s -E10 -f .\errs -c /sgml/catalog c:/sgml/bin/xml.dcl %1 > type errs > SET SP_ENCODING=ISO-8859-1 > SET SP_CHARSET_FIXED=NO That'll give you exactly the same failures to validate XML as the W3C validator (or WDG validator, arealvalidator, validator-lite), plus a few more due to limitations which have been addressed in OpenSP. I thought this subthread started when Carlos mentioned that his product offered more accurate XML validation than that. -- Nick Kew Nick's manifesto: http://www.htmlhelp.com/~nick/
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2004 09:47:13 UTC