- From: Helder Ferreira <hfilipe@fe.up.pt>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:29:37 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> > There is another point to consider here, one of choice and variety. If we > advocate the use of a single format provided by a single entity, there is a > danger of creating a monster with a controlling influence. A monopoly could > empower the provider to name their own price as it were and sponsored > results would become the only results on offer. Google powers many search > facilities as a back end provider anyway. Why provide more power to their > elbow? > I agree. But that's not the only problem. Google is one of the best search engines indeed, but there are webpages that he cannot find. Try to make a webpage just with text, no links. Or, don´t link any site to that webpage. Google never finds it, because it's based on ranking links philosophy. If there's a link anywhere on the web pointing to the page, google finds it. If not, he doesn´t. What's my point? If you use ONLY google you'll miss a few percentage of webpages in the results.
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2004 03:29:59 UTC