- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:37:53 -0400
- To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Catherine Alfieri" <calfieri@ROCHESTER.RR.COM> To: <EASI@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:24 AM Subject: CURR: Accessible Society E-Letter 4/6/2004 - Electronic and housing access How is industry doing with access? Access guidelines for electronic products and for the built environment are having an effect, to be sure. More products, more homes, more buildings are becoming accessible to people with disabilities. But how well are access guidelines actually being followed? A new survey aims to find out what consumers think of the access of a number of new electronic products; a survey last year from HUD found out how well access guidelines were being followed in HUD housing units. Currently, the Georgia Tech Research Institute wants to know what you, as a person with a disability, think of the accessibility features built into products such as ATMs, cell phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), on-line training software, distance learning software, voice recognition technologies, and televisions. If you'd like to participate in their survey, go to http://aef.gtri.gatech.edu/universal_design.html to find out more and to sign up. Last year, a survey found that most HUD buildings do have accessible entrances, on accessible routes and most have common areas that conform to HUD's "Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines." However, it found that fewer managed to ensure that light switches, electrical outlets, thermostats and such were placed at accessible levels as required by the Guidelines; ;that kitchen and bathroom access was even less compliant with the Guidelines, and that the lowest compliance was with reinforcing walls for grab bars. The multi-year study by HUD, "Multifamily Building Conformance with the Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines," was "developed in part because evidence from the field, complaints filed with HUD, and private litigation suggested that some architects, contractors, and building owners were either ignorant of, or were avoiding, the law and were building multifamily projects that did not comply with the Act's design and construction requirements.," say researchers in the report. The survey included "a review of site and building plans, on-site inspections of buildings, and tabulations of individual building evaluations." Find the complete 207-page study, "Multifamily Building Conformance with the Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines" online at http://www.huduser.org/intercept.asp?loc=/Publications/pdf/multifamily.pdf -- this is actually not a pdf page but a page allowing you to read the document as either pdf or text/html. To receive e-mails about HUD research and resources, subscribe to the HUD User listserv at http://listserv.huduser.org/ -- to subscribe, send an email to < hudusernews@huduser.org> with "subscribe" in the subject line. **************** Please visit the website of The Center for An Accessible Society at http://www.accessiblesociety.org, with more links to topics. To stop getting this e-mail letter, send an email to "info@accessiblesociety.org" with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line. The Center for An Accessible Society is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research to focus public attention on disability and independent living issues. The Center is a project of Exploding Myths, Inc. a media enterprise company. ------------------------------------------------------------- See EASI Special October Bonus offer at http://easi.cc/clinic.htm EASI November courses are: Barrier-free E-learning, Accessible Internet Multimedia and Business Benefits of Accessible IT Design: http://easi.cc/workshop.htm EASI Home Page http://www.rit.edu/~easi >>> Error in line 8 of EASI.MAILTPL: unknown formatting command <<< -> ............. <-
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 12:38:42 UTC