Re: If your company has a public website, it needs to be accessib le - and that's the law

Scarlett Julian (ED) wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Isofarro [mailto:w3evangelism@faqportal.uklinux.net]
>>Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:55 PM
>>To: Jonathan Chetwynd
>>Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
>>Subject: Re: If your company has a public website, it needs to be
>>accessible - and that's the law
> 
> 
>>The background to this story is the RNIB's legal action that's now
>>confirmed to be against two companies. These companies cannot be named
>>because of a confidentiality agreement.
>>
>>I'm covering as much info as I can find on the RNIB legal 
>>challenges at
>><http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/access/MoreDetailsOnRnibLegalAction>
>>
> 
> Mike
> 
> all I get is "No article by this name in this category." 

<http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/access/MoreDetailOnRnibLegalAction>

Grr... Detail is singular!

Sorry bout that.

Received on Sunday, 7 September 2003 09:19:36 UTC