- From: Jim Tobias <tobias@inclusive.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:40:22 -0400
- To: 'Matthew Smith' <matt@kbc.net.au>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
There's RNIB's Tiresias family: http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/bitstream/tiresias/ ***** Jim Tobias Inclusive Technologies tobias@inclusive.com 732.441.0831 v/tty www.inclusive.com > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Smith > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:49 AM > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: Best font family for accessibility? / site check request > > > > carl.myhill@ps.ge.com wrote: > > Currently, I use this... > > font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; > > Hi Carl > > The consensus points to 'open' fonts (sans serif ones) as are > your examples. > > Maximum Accessibility (Slatin & Rush, pub: Addison Wesley) recommends > these fonts for those with low vision. Mencap's "Am I Making Myself > Clear"* says to use a 'clear' typeface such as Arial or Univers for > those with learning disabilities. (I guess that Univers is another > sans-serif font.) The Mencap document appears to be done in > Helvetica. > Can't check my other books because my wife's just turned the lights > out - bedtime over here! > > Hope this helps. > > Cheers > > M > > * http://www.mencap.org.uk/html/services/accessibility_services.htm > > > -- > Matthew Smith > Kadina Business Consultancy > South Australia > http://www.kbc.net.au >
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2003 09:40:18 UTC