- From: Angela Hilton <angela.hilton@umist.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:31:46 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi Yeah - I completely agree - that kind of flashy intro isn't suitable for that kind of 'business' environment - they wouldn't want there printed literature to look like an album cover, or a typographically designed magazine. I was really thinking in terms of business areas that might warrant a visually designed site - such as pop groups, graphic design agencies themselves [if the nature of there work is more art based]. I think the rift between designers and developers is only set to get worse - where you have new technologies pulling in one direction and accessibility/usability pulling in the other. I have become exhausted with the arguments about even simple things like fonts and why text, especially body text, can't be images.....let alone the inappropriate use of flash and image rollovers. ange *********************************** Angela K Hilton Web & E-Learning Officer ISD, UMIST Tel: 0161 200 3389 *********************************** -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Voelcker Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 09:08 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Decorators with keyboards On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:43:45 +0100, Angela Hilton wrote: > Perhaps it could be argued that there are times when 'coolness' is > important Yes, I agree that there are 'horses for courses', but it is frustrating working with design agencies that want to have big Flash intros to sites and then massive graphics, image rollovers, fonts too small, complicated JavaScript, etc, that breaks virtual every usability/accessibility rule in the book. Take a look at http://www.tafisher.co.uk/ for an example of the sort of site that they expect us to put together for them. Nowadays we just refuse to do it. Cheers, Julian Voelcker Cirencester, United Kingdom
Received on Friday, 18 July 2003 04:31:47 UTC