- From: <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:46:24 +0200 (CEST)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 15 Jul, Kevin A Sesock wrote: This is the kind of letter which one shouldn't reply to until atleast 24 hours have gone by. Sadly, but also luckily, I will be out of touch for about 8 days. During that time I'll happily be vilified. Let's get it over with. I am not interested in debating this drivel with you. From the moment you started in with the "defeatist" talk, the entire debate is lost. Every time someone comes along and tells you that "That bridge is gonna fall down if you make it out of matchsticks" someone else will scream bloody murder and claim that you're "defeatist" 'cause "New anti-grav trucks will do wonderful on that bridge!" Very well. I am not willing to move onto your matchsticks bridge whether that makes me defeatist or not.[*] Until and unless you can present a method whereupon a client, which does not support the idealistic and forward-thinking methods of content inclusion (made by the good guys), can still get to the very same, and not a watered down version of, content I will stay over here in the camp of the bad, defeatist, opponents of accessibility. Answers of "Supporting X browser is asinine!" and "Upgrade!" will happily be rejected, as will "But CSS does this!". The latter is factually wrong, the former has no place in accessibility. Eagerly awaiting your answer and methodology, whilst wishing feverishly for a Sanity Clause. [*] http://www.ketchum.org/bridgecollapsepix/Tacoma.avi -- - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 12:47:55 UTC