- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:17:34 -0500
- To: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>, wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
There is damage though to the reputation of the entity and harm to the entity if there is one envolved who assisted in the development of the site and the list goes on. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie> To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:14 AM Subject: RE: when a suit is in the rong? > In today's letigeous society, it is sad that it is possible even > though all > that can be done has been done that an entity can still be sued > for lack of > accessibility or in any case, compliance with someone's idea of > accessibility even though the site is accessible. How could a court set damages if no damage was done?
Received on Monday, 24 March 2003 11:20:23 UTC