- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:17:13 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> > > Back in the day, I wrote: > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2002OctDec/0738.html> The third one uses <br><br> to simulate <p> (that was an obvious bug from the Lynx rendering - most GUI browsers interpret br wrongly, so that multiple br's simulate margins) and attempts to set caching attributes using meta (proxies ignore content). I don't believe the meta copyright statement - it's got to be a derivative work of the original, surely. <div> </div> is a new presentational hack on me. Are there any SGML experts who can tell me whether this bypasses the ignore white space rule? At least with   you know you have a non-whitespace character. I'd question a statement that the content language was "EN,EN-GB,EN-US". In my view, Revisit-After should be no more than the cache max-age, but but they attempt to make the latter zero. If it's going to be stable for humans for 7 days, it will be for robots - it's not as though they have an ad rotator for the humans, but not the robots. I think they have used their standard meta setup, not that I think that setup is a good setup. I'm ignoring the volunteered information that it doesn't work on Mozilla.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 02:45:59 UTC