- From: John Foliot - bytown internet <foliot@bytowninternet.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:22:14 -0500
- To: <tim@wiseguysonly.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
... I believe Tim the answer is that 264 angels can dance on the head of a pin... <lol> Seriously, if going for absolute political correctness I would probably first reference the organization as the <.acronym title="Hyper Text Markup Language">HTML</acronym> Writers Guild (<.acronym title="HTML Writers Guild">HWG</acronym>) JF > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Tim Roberts > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 6:13 PM > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Acronym in an acronym. > > > > I was just writing a news piece for http://www.accessify.com based on > Kynn Bartlett's announcement of the latest HWG accessibility course. > > Whilst I was cosing the post I put in the necessary acronym tag to cover > HWG like so: > > <acronym title="HTML Writers Guild">HWG</acronym> > > Then I realised that the acronym title attribute actually contains an > acronym in its self. Can accessibility go too far? > > What's a fella to do? > > Tim > > >
Received on Saturday, 8 March 2003 17:22:18 UTC