- From: Quinn, Anthony <anthonyq@testingcentre.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:32:44 +1100
- To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E04829959D1DD511ABEE0000C54F1ECB90989F@mailman.accessonline.com.au>
Hello all, I am interested in your opinions relating to the similarity or difference between rule L of US Section 508 standards and WCAG Checkpoint 6.3. My interpretation is that they are almost equivalent, except for the following differences: 1. 508 does not require a page with scripts to work if scripts are disabled or not supported, while WCAG 6.3 does. 2. 508 says "...the information provided by the script shall be identified with functional text that can be read by assistive technology." My interpretation of "functional text" is a bit hazy. I would expect that this standard requires that information provided or created by a script and the user interface controls used to manipulate the script, i.e. the input and output elements generated by the script, are in themselves accessible. However, it seems that this is not the case and all that is required is to "identify" the information. I interpret this as "provide a text description of the information". This suggests that it's OK for the output from a script to be inaccessible, as long as it has an accessible description. For example, a user might invoke a script which generates a bus timetable between locations A & B. The information contained in the timetable might be inaccessible, but as long as there is an identification, e.g. "Here is the bus timetable between A & B", this is compliant with rule L. I'm basing this on my interpretation of an explanation of 508 rule L which is available at this URL http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm#(l) For convenience, here is the text of the 508 standard in question: (l) When pages utilize scripting languages to display content, or to create interface elements, the information provided by the script shall be identified with functional text that can be read by assistive technology. As always, your opinions will be of value and interest. Cheers Anthony ------------------------------------------------ Anthony Quinn Interaction Design and Accessibility Specialist Access Testing Centre A division of Access OnLine Pty Limited 112 Alexander Street P: +61 2 9467 5047 Crows Nest NSW 2065 F: +61 2 9467 5020 E-mail: anthonyq@testingcentre.com http://www.testingcentre.com ------------------------------------------------ This email is confidential, intended solely for the addressees, and may be legally privileged. If you're not the intended recipient, any access, copying, distribution, or action taken or omitted relying on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Sunday, 2 March 2003 18:32:44 UTC