- From: Sander Tekelenburg <tekelenb@euronet.nl>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 04:50:35 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 08:43 +1100 UTC, on 2/28/03, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: [...] > There is a parallel to a lot of this in HTML - the link element. It is > most commonly used at the moment to point to a stylesheet, and > sometimes to an alternative version. But it is possible to point to the > "next page" or "previous page", "contents" or "index" or "copyright > page" or "help page" of a site. These links are then rendered in a > browser-specific way - Lynx, iCab, Mozilla, Opera all show approaches > to making these links available through the user interface. In this > case the way of activating the link is the same for every site, because > it is determined entirely by the browser. Yup. The more I think about ACCESSKEY, the more I feel that LINK has more to offer. Mostly thanks to the fact that it can be implemented in a way that offers consistency (which, in return, should make it very easy to implement keyboard access to at least a pre-defined set of LINKs). More on this at <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/WWW/LINK/>, if anyone is interested. -- Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 22:52:51 UTC