- From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:48:22 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> > > In the text that you have created to recommend not to use > "click here" I > > > think that it is important that you also explain that the > same text of a > > > link should not be used to point to different resources. > > > >Good point. One excellent "visual" demonstration of the problem > this causes > >can be seen using Opera 7, which offers (as part of the browser) a hotbar > >tab to "list all links". This may convince quite a few > "visually-dependant" > >website developers why good descriptive link text is an advantage. > > Another would be to use IE and to use the option "Print table of > links". That tends to be an eye opener on the link text. A contrary argument can be made for using words that flow naturally with the text, and solving any mystery-meat issues with additional information from title (the assumption being that whatever UA is used would make use of this in some sensible way - I don't want to start a debate about what that sensible way is again). Eg: When I finished copying it to the <a href="public/" title="web view of our public directory">pub</a> directory I went to the <a href="http://somePubSite.com" title="My "Local" - Some Public House">pub</a>. Not only is "Then I went to the pub." more natural language than anything more specific, it is also possibly the text which was then hyperlinked after-the-fact. The title *should* be enough for any UA to make the link as explicit as suits the medium used. Anything which lists links, such as Opera 7 or IE on printing, could make use of the title to prevent the ambiguity of "pub".
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 05:47:34 UTC