- From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:04:24 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> LOL - oops <sheepish look /> > Of course there is no document that defines the accessibility > element. There is a DC working group looking at the potential use > of metadata in accessibility and it's an element in the e-Govt > Metadata Standard(e-GMS) but I'm so used to putting "DC." in > front of my element names that somehow that one inexplicably > slipped through the usual rigid control I have over my keyboard ;P > > Well spotted that man ;-) You had me worried there. I knew of the working group, and you led me to think that maybe they'd produced something in the main DC namespace I wasn't aware of. Hopefully any such element would use schemes (to allow for different ways of stating accessibility assessments). As such a null value would be meaningless, but it might be meaningful with a schema which only allowed for one value (e.g. if a WAI scheme allowed for "A", "AA" and "AAA", but only one of those, then null would presumably mean that none of those applied) - however if such a scheme had a value defined which meant there was no such qualification this would be more useful in being more explicit.
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:03:34 UTC