- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:10:10 +1100
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I agree with Jim on both points - and said so last time this was discussed in this forum - see the 4-message thread starting at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2003JanMar/0182 (two weeks ago). On Wednesday, Feb 5, 2003, at 06:39 Australia/Melbourne, Jim Ley wrote: > > > "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:77FBB387-3877-11D7-A5B3-0003939B5AD0@btinternet.com... >> >> We use absolute positioning so I'm wondering what the theory is on >> this? >> Is there any explicit separation? seems unlikely :-( > > If you're positioning with CSS, then you can easily provide characters > which > are hidden, or positioned elsewhere when css is enabled, this > requirement > obviously only applies to the non CSS-P situation. > >> and finally SVG, how are links supposed to be separated in what has >> the >> potential to be a fine mess? > > User Agents for SVG have to cope with this in a different way, they > are very > different mark-up languages, and techniques don't directly translate. > > Jim. > > > -- Charles McCathieNevile charles@sidar.org Fundación SIDAR http://www.sidar.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 16:10:23 UTC