- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:54:42 +1100
- To: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie>
- Cc: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Yes, it would be ideal to be able to provide information. I think that the title attribute is the one that is relevant, since it describes the role of the element within the document. So we have the bind of whether to guess which user agent is most popular and write rules for it, changing them as soon as a different piece of software with different behaviour becomes more popular, or to provide suggestions for standards, suggest that people start by assuming standards support, and then look at workarounds for particular implementations that don't get it right but may be popular (because they get it more right than others, because they are given to people who cannot then replace them, or for whatever other reason people use broken tools). cheers Chaals On Thursday, Jan 23, 2003, at 01:16 Australia/Melbourne, Jon Hanna wrote: > >> the difference here is that while alt="" shows nothing, summary="" >> will >> still say summary. > > Okay. That rules out summary="" in practice, with current AT > behaviour, but > would it be better to use summary like this in theory (and have AT keep > quiet)? > > -- Charles McCathieNevile charles@sidar.org Fundación SIDAR http://www.sidar.org
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 18:55:08 UTC