- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:36:17 +1100
- To: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, vincent9@gte.net
Peepo is a bit f a special case, since in its primary rendering the case for not having text is strong. It should, in my opinion, be easy to get browsers to add the text equivalents (which peepo does have) top the rendered view - this is also the opinion of The User Agent Accessibility Guidelines. In general I don't like image-only links, since I am not sure where they go, but I usually use a browser that will show me the text alternative. If there isn't one, or if the site doesn't offer anything to me, I go somewhere else. Also, I don't like celery much, so if the site is all about eating raw celery I go somewhere else. Having the text is important, and having a neat way to present it as an option would be good - at least in some view. The other big question is how to get between views of course. In the peepo case I think hiding the text makes sense as a default, but in general I agree with the comment. cheers chaals On Monday, Jan 20, 2003, at 18:38 Australia/Melbourne, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: > > http://www.peepo.com recently(15/01/03) starred at webpagesthatsuck: > http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2003/01/15.html#a593 > > Vincent suggests that image links should or indeed must have a visible > text label, not merely an alt tag, for more details visit: > http://www.fixingyourwebsite.com/mysterymeat.html > > what say you? > > thanks > > Jonathan Chetwynd > > -- Charles McCathieNevile charles@sidar.org Fundación SIDAR http://www.sidar.org
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 03:37:17 UTC