- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:30:46 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi Julian, It's not a matter of seeing, it is a matter of needing graphics for orientation. I know that others on this list Such as Jonathan will speak to this issue more clearly. It has to do with comprehensibility. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Voelcker" <asp@tvw.net> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 7:34 PM Subject: Re: Frames and Accessibility Hi David, > while we are discussing alternate views, I should point out that there other > than screen readers that may not be able to use frames effectively so > providing a no frames text version may be a bit of underkill. You may wish > to consult with others on this list for input as to what should go into the > alternative because a text only page will not be useable by some who also > cannot use frames. OK, I can understand that people might have problems with frames, however surely if they can't read a simple text web page they will be struggling to see anything on the web? Cheers, Julian Voelcker
Received on Sunday, 19 January 2003 20:31:16 UTC