RE: to js or not to js?

David Poehlman said:

> For those suggesting that one should rely on js being turned 
> off in order to provide non js functionality, this 
> problematic in that in many cases, js is needed and to have 
> to turn off the js in a browser in order to achieve 
> accessibility to a site specifically would break 
> accessibility for other sites if inadvertantly left off.

Well, that's an interesting perspective that I never thought I would hear on
this list:)

I agree with you, David.

I think that you have to expect JS will be turned on, and develop with the
idea in mind that JS *might* be turned off or not supported.  But I never
quite thought about it in the way you said.

----------
Randal Rust
Covansys, Inc.
Columbus, OH

Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 09:02:48 UTC