- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 21:29:55 +0200
- To: yoan.simonian@snv.jussieu.fr
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
WCAG says that the names have to be clear enough to make it obvious what is happening. "nav" is not obvious, but "site navigation" or is more so. The name attribute can not include spaces, so in many cases you will want to use a title attribute (you are writing for people to read, where french may not be their first language - avoid being cryptic - which is a P1 checkpoint). But I can't see anything in WCAG that makes it compulsory to use the title attribute. name="advertisement" is one example of something that probably doesn't need a title to expand further. (Make sure the ads are accessible though - everyone wants to be able to ignore them, but also when they try to find out what is being advertised they like to be able to. It is also helpful to provide noframes content that makes the site workable anyway. There are examples of this "in the wild" (i.e. on Websites that don't make any particular claim to be accessible) but they are rarer than they should be. regards Charles On Thursday, Jun 19, 2003, at 12:07 Europe/Zurich, yoan SIMONIAN wrote: > > Another question. > For the frames, if the NAME attribute is explicit, is the title > attribute mandatory ? > > thanks again for your help. > > > ###########o0°Association BrailleNet °0o ###### > cellule accessibilité > 9 Quai Saint-Bernard > 75 252 PARIS Cedex 5 > tel : 01 44 27 26 25 > http://www.braillenet.org/accessibilite > http://www.accessiweb.org > ################################################ > 2003-06-19 > > > -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundación Sidar charles@sidar.org http://www.sidar.org
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 15:30:52 UTC