- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:38:28 +0200
- To: "John Foliot - WATS.ca" <foliot@wats.ca>
- Cc: "Scarlett Julian \(ED\)" <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Somewhere deep in WAI archives from 2000 is a discussion of using em to size image icons. It should work, and I believe it turned out that in some browsers it did work even back then - combined with a scalable format like SVG or flash it would sometimes be helpful for people who have low vision and can't quite make out the details of a chart... This is one case where em and percentages are going to do different things. The fact that em is firmly tied to the font is helpful for scaling some stuff, because percentages are sometimes related to the font and sometimes to the viewport (and in some bugs they're related to a magic unguessable number). by the way, ex is also a unit related to the font size - but I don't see it used much. (I forget the exact definition, which is in the spec, but I think it is the width of the font, or the height of a lower case letter, or something). Cheers Chaals On Wednesday, Jun 18, 2003, at 17:11 Europe/Zurich, John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote: > > Julian, > > May I humbly point you to http://wats.ca/resources/relativesizing/20. > In this case, by using ems I can apply the sizing to more than just > fonts. To that end then, ems would be more "practical"? > > Just my $.03 (which given the current US/Canadian exchange rate is > about $.02...) > > -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundación Sidar charles@sidar.org http://www.sidar.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 11:39:17 UTC