- From: The Snider's Web <lsnider@thesnidersweb.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:58:54 -0300
- To: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>, WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi David, True, as it does make people think about why it might be there. I suspect I will use both ways as I reburbish old sites as sometimes the design may not work well with the link showing (although in thinking about it more-that would be rare). Cheers Lisa At 01:04 PM 6/12/2003 -0400, David Poehlman wrote: >There is no reason not to make the skip nav visible and it can aide even >more people that way. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "The Snider's Web" <lsnider@thesnidersweb.com> >Hi Joe, > >Thanks for posting this link-it was very interesting to read. > >I just got this info from another publication about Google, which is quite >worrisome: > >...Google [is] declaring all hidden links as >bad and automatically checking every page for them...Most >invisible links do fall into the spam category, but not all. If you >look at http://www.cnn.com/ you will find an invisible GIF link >telling you to "Click here to skip to main content." Is this spam? >Absolutely not. What CNN is doing is an accessibility technique >called "skip navigation" to make their site friendlier to people with >disabilities. > >I really hope they are not going to penalize people for trying to make >sites more accessible :( > >Cheers > >Lisa
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 13:59:43 UTC