WAICAG, checkpoint 6.3 [priority 1], tells us that a web page should be usable if the user agent has turned the script object off or does not support it, e.g. JavaScript. I try to live up to this guideline, not because of the guideline, but because it gives me a nice feeling of BEST PRACTICE, of having a sound and solid foundation to build on. But I would like to know if it actually benefits anybody: 1) Do we have any users with disabilities that have to use a user agent not supporting JavaScript? 2) Why do some people want to use a no-JavaScript browser like Lynx? 3) Why do we not have a similar guideline about scripts in Section 508? Best regards, Jesper TverskovReceived on Thursday, 12 June 2003 08:17:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:15 UTC