- From: Julia Collins <julia@we3.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:38:56 +0100
- To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, Kevin A Sesock <sesock@okstate.edu>
- CC: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Might there be legal issues for the future (UK) and currently (US) if OSX and therefore all new macs are inaccessible to people with low or no vision? Just a thought. Julia On 12/6/03 1:13 am, "Nick Kew" <nick@webthing.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Kevin A Sesock wrote: > >> I have a feeling that the W3C WAI interest group could at the very least >> put significant pressure on them to do so. It might just be enough. > > That presupposes it's worth rescuing. I don't know, and someone suggested > (in private email following my post) that it's tied to an old MacOS, > and that it might be more productive to start from existing Unix > products for OSX. > >> What >> do you believe would be next step to get the vendor to open the code? > > A polite request from someone who would take an active interest (not me - > I have no access to Mac hardware, nor expertise in HCI). > >> What >> license do you think we should push for? GPL? FreeBSD? > > I wouldn't push for any until and unless the copyright holder asks > for suggestions. "Release the source - or as much of it as isn't > prohibited by third-party copyright - and you might want to consider > using one of the established open source licenses, such as ..." > > Opening the source might turn it into the worlds best app, but the > a-priori chances are higher it'll do nothing at all. That depends > on many things, but above all it has to have enough to offer to > attract developers into reusing the source in preference to > working from scratch or using other existing programs,
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 04:40:20 UTC