- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:41:54 -0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
"John Foliot - bytown internet" <foliot@bytowninternet.com> wrote in message news:GKEFJJEKDDIMBHJOGLENCEIOCLAA.foliot@bytowninternet.com... > Locking down window sizes seems to me to be > counter-productive... Perhaps, but again, making a pop-up window not-resizable, is a choice the author has suggested, the default is to have the window resizable, so again it's only an argument if the script is poorly authored. Of course one of the biggest problems we have is atrocious script authoring. > Back to the JavaScript example, with the explosion of "anti pop-up" software > out there (Popup Killer - www.stopzilla.com, Popup Zapper - > www.versiontracker.com, BanPopup - www.oiisoft.com/BanPopup, PopUpCop - > www.popupcop.com, ...need I go on?) Clearly many mainstream users dislike > this behaviour, as witnessed by the softwares above and others like it. And > none of these softwares (that I'm aware of) recognize "good" popups .vs > "bad" popups. but only the worst prevent simple fallback of a simple link working (the worst here being Mozilla's built in version until the bug was fixed) > > I have to say I don't believe they can even "sort of" let alone anything > > else. > > OK, Jim, I should have stated "allege to". See: > www.mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/sniffer/browser_type.html Yes, There's a "new" bug in mozilla about that page: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108162 It's only 10 months old... Jim.
Received on Sunday, 15 September 2002 13:42:13 UTC