- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:10:32 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Shashank Tripathi <sub@shanx.com>
- cc: "'W3C-WAI-IG List'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "'Jon Hanna'" <jon@spin.ie>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Shashank Tripathi wrote: >You could consider using percentages. E.g., Yep. Below, I meant "normal text" - the general stuff that makes up a page, which would be read through. I agree that highlighting particular things is valuable, and small print is so-called because people are used to the (in theory) administrative detail they don't need to read being smaller. But a lot of sites use something like small, or 70%, as a default size for ordinary paragraph text. So I have to increase it again so I can read it. Cheers Chaals > | Oh, and please don't make normal text bigger or smaller > | than the user's default. Although some people can't > | change their default size, it is frustrating for people > | who have set a size that they need.) > > >I am not sure if I would completely agree with this stance though. >Sizing text to convey certain meanings or to control prominence is a >necessary part of presentation and font-sizes play an important role in >achieving that goal. For e.g., in a message board on a website, the text >that people post could be normal sized but the time of posting or the >number of posts by a certain individual (which are not an equally >significant part of the overall information) could be a relatively >smaller size. > >While it is frustrating for people to see fonts that are incongruent to >their 'ordinary' sizes, it is equally if not more frustrating to scour >for relevant info from a page that contains all the text in one >same-sized blob. I would rather see the usual, focal topic of the >interface in a 'normal' font, but would prefer all the ancillary info to >be slightly smaller...not to mention that certain sections can be >highlighted for prominence (e.g., section titles). > >One could say "Use the standard H2 for the titles" -- but perhaps this >is a subjective issue where the designer's judgment comes into play and >one may decide that 18px of Arial looks better than whatever "default" >H2 the user has on his/her machine (e.g., an 18px Verdana). > >Shanx > > >Shashank Tripathi >www.shanx.com > > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe ------------ WAI http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia fax(fr): +33 4 92 38 78 22 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2002 08:10:34 UTC