- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 19:47:39 +0100 (BST)
- To: Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Martin McCormick wrote: > On this list we discuss the art and science of making web > sites as accessible as possible within the bounds of reason. > What do you do when a company is just dead wrong? Martin, This doesn't address your problem at all, but as a Unix user with adequate eyesight and a user of graphical web browsers, I too have found Verispam / Notwork not merely difficult but impossible to use over a long period. In part the website is the worst I have ever had the misfortune to try and use, and is totally illegible to me in my usual browser (Konqueror). Equally problematic, when I have given myself a headache fighting with it, I can finally get to the point where it claims to have emailed me and wants confirmation, whereupon the email never arrives. In fact, the mere existence of this email correspondence shows you've got further than me with them! I voted with my feet, which in itself involved a prolonged correspondence with an extremely helpful domain registrar (gradwell.com) who now have my business. I understand that this kind of experience is quite usual with Verispam victims. > Read the following message traffic and get a first-hand > look at how things really work when one is dealing with a private > company which appears to be out-sourcing all the real work over > seas. But in this case, it's not just you! -- Nick Kew
Received on Saturday, 17 August 2002 14:47:43 UTC